Your online news source for Alachua Florida.


Departments



Contents

Medicare For All via H.R. 676
January 4th, 2008

Change is about policies-not speeches and symbolism
January 4th, 2008

Home Country
December 26th, 2007

Home Country
December 19th, 2007

Home Country
December 12th, 2007

Home Country
December 5th, 2007

Home Country
November 28th, 2007

Policing Corporate Pricing Policies
November 27th, 2007

Purchasing Fresh Christmas Trees Online
November 23rd, 2007

Home Country
November 21st, 2007

Home Country
November 14th, 2007

Waterboarding Republicans vs. Supporting Our Troops
November 9th, 2007

We Want More!
November 7th, 2007

Home Country
November 7th, 2007

Picking A Democratic Winner For President
November 4th, 2007

The Nonviolent Army
September 23rd, 2007

Bush Speech on Iraq and Democrats on Impeachment
September 16th, 2007

UF Student Alumni Association Gains National Attention
September 8th, 2007

Alachua County Highlighted in Report
August 30th, 2007

Florida To Subsidize European Raid on Florida Forests
August 29th, 2007

Home Country
August 29th, 2007

Thoughts on Fasting
August 26th, 2007

Home Country
August 22nd, 2007

Karl Rove: Democratic Secret Weapon
August 16th, 2007

Riverkeeper Sues JEA
August 16th, 2007

More

Change is about policies-not speeches and symbolism

Change is about policies-not speeches and symbolism

Stephen S. Crockett

Edwards has better policies for substantive change than either Clinton or Obama. Symbolism and speeches is not enough. (1) While I find Obama inspiring especially when giving speeches, he has the worse plan of the top three contenders on healthcare and Edwards has the best. The best approach is expanding Medicare to cover all citizens which none of the top contenders currently support. Edwards comes closer than the other two top Democratic contenders. Edwards has a history of evolving his policy positions when educated by activists and experts with better ideas. Of the top three Democratic candidates, Edwards is the most likely candidate to eventually support Medicare For All. Obama's plan does not get us to universal healthcare and definitely leaves large corporations with excessive control of healthcare policies in America. (2) While Obama always opposed starting the Iraq War, he would not get us out of Iraq as quickly or completely as Edwards. Clinton has not been a leader on this issue in the past or today. (3) On trade issues, Obama is far friendlier to the so-called "Free Trade" approach than Edwards. For example, on the recent deal with Peru both Clinton and Obama supported the "Free Trade" deal while Edwards opposed it. These "free trade" deals all serve corporate interests and are devastating the earning power of working class Americans. (4) Compromising with Bush Republicans on policy sounds good as a sound-bite but is not likely to work. Obama cannot unite all Americans behind a common set of policies and still be an effective agent of change. The Republican in the House and Senate oppose all the change ideas supported by the vast majority of Americans. Over 70 percent of Americans want universal healthcare but the Republicans like our current, inefficient, unfair, corporate-controlled healthcare system. Any compromises with corporate Republicans on the healthcare issue will mean making the changes more inefficient, unfair and corporate-controlled! The same idea holds with trade policy, media consolidation, campaign financing, environmental protection, energy policy, global warming, taxation, labor laws, etc. The only effective approach to change will come from confronting corporate Republican forces, fighting them and winning. This is the Edwards approach. It is the FDR approach to real change. It was the path to Social Security under FDR and Medicare under LBJ. It is not the Clinton Approach. It is not the path advocated by Obama. While Obama would make a good Vice President on an Edwards ticket, he is not the best agent for change on the Democratic Presidential ticket in 2008. It was unfortunate that Senator Lieberman played a mentor role to Obama when Obama was first elected to the U.S. Senate. The independent Senator from Connecticut is out of touch with the core values of the Democratic Party when it comes to change on many issues. The Lieberman influence will need time to fade before Obama will really be ready for the top of the Democratic ticket or to act as the real leader for policy change in America. Written by Stephen Crockett (Co-host of Democratic Talk Radio http://www.DemocraticTalkRadio.com and Editor of Mid-Atlantic Labor.com http://www.midatlanticlabor.com )

Click for printer friendly version

Email this article to a friend

 

Advertisement




© 2003 Alachua Post Enterprises